[Community] Fwd: [geos-devel] 3.1 vs 3.2

[Sean Gillies]

Can anybody confirm that Shapely reaps better performance with the  
GEOS trunk?

Begin forwarded message:

> From: strk <strk at keybit.net>
> Date: December 9, 2009 9:59:04 AM CEST
> To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.1 vs 3.2
> Reply-To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:12:38PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> Not sure what this means, but:
>
>> ---- 3.1 ----               > ---- 3.2 ----
>>>
>> Files: 20                   > Files: 58
>> Tests: 2216                 > Tests: 3582
>> Failed: 0                   > Failed: 0
>> Succeeded: 2216             > Succeeded: 3582
>> PASS: testrunner            > PASS: testrunner
>>>
>> real  0m29.194s             > real  0m11.558s
>> user  0m24.750s             > user  0m10.630s
>> sys   0m1.489s              > sys   0m0.230s
>
> Much more tests in less of half the time !
> It seems to mean 3.2.0 rocks :)
>
> --strk;
>
> Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer      ()  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> http://foo.keybit.net/~strk/services.html  /\  Keep it simple!
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

--
Sean